Chess World in Uproar as Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against Reigning World Champion Carlsen

The chess world has been turned upside down, by a 19-year-old champion who defeated the perennial greatest in the world, Magnus Carlsen. After the teenager defeated Carlsen at the Sinquefield Cup tournament ("Cup") in September of 2022 in St. Louis, Missouri, rumors swirled about alleged cheating by the teenager, Hans Neiman, the champion of the important chess tournament. While it was not the first time Carlsen was defeated by Nieman, it was the first time that happened at an officially sanctioned event. 

While Carlsen never directly accused Nieman of cheating, he is purported to have done so in so many words. Carlsen decided to not participate in the rest of the Cup, something nearly unheard of for a reigning world champion. Soon thereafter, the two faced off again at a new tournament, the Julius Baer Generation Cup. After one move, Carlsen decided to forfeit the game and not move forward. 

Notably, this is the not the first time Neiman has been accused of cheating. In fact, Neiman has admitted to cheating in past matches, including matches with money on the line. Despite the speculation that Neiman has continued to cheat, including in recent matches, there has been no hard evidence offered to suggest that Neiman cheated in the Cup earlier this year. 

Resulting from these "allegation," Neiman alleges harm as a result of the allegations, he alleges retaliation, including through Chess.com, a prominent chess community which acquired Carlsen's company through a merger for $83 million. 

The Complaint characterizes Carlsen's "accusations" as having had "no legitimate basis." Neiman does not allege that Carlsen actually made any specific direct accusations, rather that his course of conduct would be reasonably perceived as defamatory allegations. The Complaint specifically states that Carlsen knew: 

        (i) the public would believe his accusations of cheating against Neimann, even though Carlsen had no         legitimate basis to believe Neimann actually cheated against him; 
        (ii) he could ensure that no reputable chess tournament would invite Niemann to compete in the                 future; and 
        (iii) his false accusations would cause other top chess players to boycott Niemann as well.

Neiman seeks $100 million in damages, based upon Neiman being banned from Chess.com after the purported allegations. The Complaint also names Hikaru Nakamura, a prominent Chess.com streamer for "amplifying" the purported allegations; against Chess.com executive Danny Resnch, for alleged defamatory press releases; and against Chess.com for its purported role in the retaliation. 

Time will tell what happens in response to this. The only certainty is that the chess world will continue to be upside down with everything going on. 


Jake A. Leahy

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nakiya Moran v. Calumet City, Illinois

Nakiya Moran was convicted for murder and aggravated battery with a firearm, arising out of a 2006 shooting in Calumet City, Illinois. After being convicted, the defendant learned that Calumet City had failed to turn over a ballistics report, which tied the firearm used to a different shooting. Moran alleged that this evidence had to have been turned over pursuant to Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (establishing the rule that the prosecution must turn over all evidence that might exonerate the defendant).  Moran sought postconviction relief under the Brady standard, a state court vacated the conviction and allowed a new bench trial in 2017. The new evidence was admitted at the retrial. Moran was acquitted.  Moran subsequently filed a lawsuit in federal court, seeking damages for the more than ten years he spent in federal prison. His complaint was brought against the city, detectives, and a crime scene technician. The Northern District of Illinois entered summary judgment in fav
Read more

Court Finds Uber Arbitration Agreement Invalid, In-App Terms and Conditions Not Enough

 A Pennsylvania Appeals Court considered the extent that a purported arbitration agreement is enforceable for riders on the Uber app. It is increasingly commonplace for users to "agree" to clickthrough, scroll through, or hyperlinked terms and conditions, in order to use an app or other sort of online program. While these sorts of agreements are generally considered to be acceptable, there may be certain provisions which require further attention. Shannon Chilutti filed a lawsuit against Uber after being injured while riding in the car. Uber contends however, that Chilutti may not file a lawsuit and request a jury trial because of the mandatory arbitration agreement which is included in Uber's terms and conditions. On the first page of the court's decision, the court tips its hand, characterizing the central issue as "whether a party should be deprived of their constitutional right to a jury trial when they purportedly enter into an arbitration agreement via a se
Read more