Biden Administration Looks to Change Who is Considered a Gig Worker Under Proposed DOL Regulation

Tuesday morning, the Department of Labor announced new regulations pertaining to how gig workers are classified. The battle has often taken place in the past at the state level, for example, ride share companies recently invested heavily to defeat propositions in California which would have required that drivers for Uber and Lyft be classified as traditional employees, rather than independent contractors. 

The regulation will require a review period and comments will be received. The 184 page proposed regulation includes a new framework, which departs from the Trump-era test, which primarily considered 1.) the nature and degree of control over the work; and 2.) the worker's opportunity for profit or loss. While the previous test included three other factors, those two were the primary considerations as to whether a worker can be classified as an independent contractor. 

Under this test, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that an employer's control of actions in certain instances is justified and is considered to be irrelevant under the economic reality analysis, since the primary analytical framework requires a review of the "nature and degree of the employer's rule," rather than a review of why said control exists. Scantland v. Jeffry Knight, Inc., 721 F.3d 1308, 1316 (Eleventh Circuit 2013).

The new test purports to establish a "totality of the circumstances" review, which will include several new factors into a balancing test. The regulation states that this sort of review is well-established, as a six pronged test was established in the Supreme Court opinions Rutherford and Silk. 

The new test would review the (a.) economic reality test, based upon multiple factors to form a totality of the circumstances review; and (b.) economic reality factors, such as (i.) opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill, (ii.) investments by the worker and their employer, (iii.) degree of permanence of the work relationship, (iv.) nature and degree of control, (v.) extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer's business, (vi.) skill and initiative, and (viii.) additional factors. 

The proposed regulations will surely have a major impact on any employer with independent contractors. If and when it officially kicks in, a thorough review will surely be warranted to ensure proper compliance.

Read the proposed DOL regulation here.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michigan Tribunal Rules Wayfair Does Not Create Nexus for Local Tax Based on Resident Agent

 The 2018 Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair  overturned the 1992 decision  Quill Corp. v. North Dakota , which was a decision that strictly prohibited states from imposing sales taxes on vendors through mail order or internet businesses unless the vendor had a "physical presence" in the state. That decision, which came in the early days of the internet, represented a strikingly different world of internet sales. For example, Amazon was still two years away from its launch and Jeff Bezos had yet to even sell a book online.  The Michigan Tax Tribunal recently issued a decision in Apex Laboratories International, Inc. v. City of Detroit . This matter was brought forward after years of continued litigation, as the case was remanded to the Tribunal from the Court of Appeals over the question of whether the the Supreme Court's Wayfair decision changed the ruling as to whether Apex  could be found liable for local taxes instituted by the City of Detroit...
Read more

Trade secrets and unfair competition complaint - Gallagher v. Alliant Insurance

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. filed a federal lawsuit Thursday against Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. In the Northern District of Illinois.   The 43 page Complaint alleged several different causes of actions including: I. Tortuous interference with a contract; II. Tortious interference with prospective economic advantage;  III. Aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; and  IV. Conspiracy.  While each element requires a fact-intensive analysis, there are several themes and considerations to consider as they play out. First, the crux of the dispute arises as Alliant allegedly has repeatedly recruited employees from Gallagher.  Per the Complaint, as they are recruited, they are asked to retain certain types of confidential information. In doing so, this places Gallagher in a precarious situation and requires that the employees not fulfill their duty of loyalty to Gallagher during the course of their employment.  While several fact patters stand out, an ...
Read more

New Treas. Reg. Provides New Guidance on IRS and State Investigations of Non-Profit Tax Status

Today, the Internal Revenue Service officially published a new Treasury Regulation entitled "Disclosure of Information to State Officials Regarding Tax-Exempt Organizations." Prior to enactment, the IRS was often unable to communicate with a state Attorney General regarding an ongoing investigation pertaining to the status of a non-profit organization. At times, this often amounted to both organizations investigating substantially similar issues, however, the IRS was unable to disclose the status of an ongoing investigation unless it had been finalized.   While the IRS was able to share some information with certain state officers, the IRS is now directed to inform a so-called "appropriate State officer" ("ASO") of (1.) a refusal to recognize an entity as a charitable organization; (2.) a charitable organization which no longer meets the guidelines to be tax-exempt; and (3.) mailing a notice of deficiency for any tax imposed under IRS Section 507 or Chapte...
Read more