Biden Administration Looks to Change Who is Considered a Gig Worker Under Proposed DOL Regulation

Tuesday morning, the Department of Labor announced new regulations pertaining to how gig workers are classified. The battle has often taken place in the past at the state level, for example, ride share companies recently invested heavily to defeat propositions in California which would have required that drivers for Uber and Lyft be classified as traditional employees, rather than independent contractors. 

The regulation will require a review period and comments will be received. The 184 page proposed regulation includes a new framework, which departs from the Trump-era test, which primarily considered 1.) the nature and degree of control over the work; and 2.) the worker's opportunity for profit or loss. While the previous test included three other factors, those two were the primary considerations as to whether a worker can be classified as an independent contractor. 

Under this test, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that an employer's control of actions in certain instances is justified and is considered to be irrelevant under the economic reality analysis, since the primary analytical framework requires a review of the "nature and degree of the employer's rule," rather than a review of why said control exists. Scantland v. Jeffry Knight, Inc., 721 F.3d 1308, 1316 (Eleventh Circuit 2013).

The new test purports to establish a "totality of the circumstances" review, which will include several new factors into a balancing test. The regulation states that this sort of review is well-established, as a six pronged test was established in the Supreme Court opinions Rutherford and Silk. 

The new test would review the (a.) economic reality test, based upon multiple factors to form a totality of the circumstances review; and (b.) economic reality factors, such as (i.) opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill, (ii.) investments by the worker and their employer, (iii.) degree of permanence of the work relationship, (iv.) nature and degree of control, (v.) extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer's business, (vi.) skill and initiative, and (viii.) additional factors. 

The proposed regulations will surely have a major impact on any employer with independent contractors. If and when it officially kicks in, a thorough review will surely be warranted to ensure proper compliance.

Read the proposed DOL regulation here.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chess World in Uproar as Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against Reigning World Champion Carlsen

The chess world has been turned upside down, by a 19-year-old champion who defeated the perennial greatest in the world, Magnus Carlsen. After the teenager defeated Carlsen at the Sinquefield Cup tournament ("Cup") in September of 2022 in St. Louis, Missouri, rumors swirled about alleged cheating by the teenager, Hans Neiman, the champion of the important chess tournament. While it was not the first time Carlsen was defeated by Nieman, it was the first time that happened at an officially sanctioned event.  While Carlsen never directly accused Nieman of cheating, he is purported to have done so in so many words. Carlsen decided to not participate in the rest of the Cup, something nearly unheard of for a reigning world champion. Soon thereafter, the two faced off again at a new tournament, the Julius Baer Generation Cup. After one move, Carlsen decided to forfeit the game and not move forward.  Notably, this is the not the first time Neiman has been accused of cheating. In fact
Read more

Court Finds Uber Arbitration Agreement Invalid, In-App Terms and Conditions Not Enough

 A Pennsylvania Appeals Court considered the extent that a purported arbitration agreement is enforceable for riders on the Uber app. It is increasingly commonplace for users to "agree" to clickthrough, scroll through, or hyperlinked terms and conditions, in order to use an app or other sort of online program. While these sorts of agreements are generally considered to be acceptable, there may be certain provisions which require further attention. Shannon Chilutti filed a lawsuit against Uber after being injured while riding in the car. Uber contends however, that Chilutti may not file a lawsuit and request a jury trial because of the mandatory arbitration agreement which is included in Uber's terms and conditions. On the first page of the court's decision, the court tips its hand, characterizing the central issue as "whether a party should be deprived of their constitutional right to a jury trial when they purportedly enter into an arbitration agreement via a se
Read more

Nakiya Moran v. Calumet City, Illinois

Nakiya Moran was convicted for murder and aggravated battery with a firearm, arising out of a 2006 shooting in Calumet City, Illinois. After being convicted, the defendant learned that Calumet City had failed to turn over a ballistics report, which tied the firearm used to a different shooting. Moran alleged that this evidence had to have been turned over pursuant to Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (establishing the rule that the prosecution must turn over all evidence that might exonerate the defendant).  Moran sought postconviction relief under the Brady standard, a state court vacated the conviction and allowed a new bench trial in 2017. The new evidence was admitted at the retrial. Moran was acquitted.  Moran subsequently filed a lawsuit in federal court, seeking damages for the more than ten years he spent in federal prison. His complaint was brought against the city, detectives, and a crime scene technician. The Northern District of Illinois entered summary judgment in fav
Read more